Boston Dynamics (Hyundai) vs 1X Technologies β independent, side-by-side analysis.
Atlas (Electric) leads in higher payload, while NEO leads in more DOF. The two robots are evenly matched, each excelling in different areas.

Boston Dynamics (Hyundai)

1X Technologies
25
Atlas (Electric)
10
NEO
NVIDIA Isaac (ROS2) but limited public access. Mostly enterprise.
Proprietary World Model AI. No public SDK.
Atlas (Electric): ~$420,000 (enterprise estimate). NEO: $20,000. Only one of the two has a public unit price; the other publishes a range or enterprise-only terms.
Atlas (Electric) rates a higher payload at 50 kg vs 25 kg. Payload ratings are vendor claims and do not always include a duty cycle β peak vs sustained payload can differ significantly.
Atlas (Electric) is in active development without commercial availability. NEO is open for preorders. Status reflects the vendor's published commercial position as of the last review and can change between announcement and actual delivery.
Atlas (Electric) has ros2; NEO has no ROS support. For research and multi-vendor robotics stacks, native ROS 2 is the strongest signal of ecosystem maturity.
Atlas (Electric) ships with LiDAR for depth sensing; NEO does not. LiDAR adds cost and complexity but improves obstacle detection in low-light or low-contrast environments.
Last updated: 2024