Boston Dynamics (Hyundai) vs Honda β independent, side-by-side analysis.
Atlas (Electric) leads in higher payload, while ASIMO leads in more DOF. The two robots are evenly matched, each excelling in different areas.

Boston Dynamics (Hyundai)

Honda
25
Atlas (Electric)
β
ASIMO
NVIDIA Isaac (ROS2) but limited public access. Mostly enterprise.
Atlas (Electric): ~$420,000 (enterprise estimate). ASIMO: Never sold commercially.
Atlas (Electric) rates a higher payload at 50 kg vs 1 kg. Payload ratings are vendor claims and do not always include a duty cycle β peak vs sustained payload can differ significantly.
Atlas (Electric) is in active development without commercial availability. ASIMO has been discontinued. Status reflects the vendor's published commercial position as of the last review and can change between announcement and actual delivery.
Atlas (Electric) has ros2; ASIMO has no ROS support. For research and multi-vendor robotics stacks, native ROS 2 is the strongest signal of ecosystem maturity.
Atlas (Electric) ships with LiDAR for depth sensing; ASIMO does not. LiDAR adds cost and complexity but improves obstacle detection in low-light or low-contrast environments.
Last updated: 2024