Figure AI vs Pollen Robotics (Hugging Face) β independent, side-by-side analysis.
Figure 03 leads in more DOF, higher payload. Overall, Figure 03 has an edge in 2 out of 2 compared categories.

Figure AI

Pollen Robotics (Hugging Face)
8
Figure 03
91
Reachy 2
Consumer focus. No developer ecosystem.
Fully open-source HW+SW. ROS2. Hugging Face backing. Best-in-class openness.
Figure 03: ~$20,000 (consumer target) Β· 240 units/month (Apr 2026). Reachy 2: ~$70,000β$100,000.
Figure 03 rates a higher payload at 20 kg vs 3 kg. Payload ratings are vendor claims and do not always include a duty cycle β peak vs sustained payload can differ significantly.
Yes. Both are commercially available as of the last review. Delivery timelines and customer geographies vary per vendor β check the manufacturer page for each.
Figure 03 has no ROS support; Reachy 2 has ros2. For research and multi-vendor robotics stacks, native ROS 2 is the strongest signal of ecosystem maturity.
Reachy 2 ships with LiDAR for depth sensing; Figure 03 does not. LiDAR adds cost and complexity but improves obstacle detection in low-light or low-contrast environments.
Last updated: 2025